Engage us for a single line or the full consultancy — spanning engineering documentation, research and development, certification support, and prototyping and procurement.
Familiar with ARP 4754A (Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems) and ARP 4761 (Safety Assessment Process Guidelines).
Access to relevant engineering talent and partner organisations to build out program ecosystems.
Familiar with FAR, EASA, Indonesian CASR Part 22, STANAG, and MIL-STD documentation frameworks, alongside CASA RePL/ReOC requirements for Australian operations.
Multirotor, fixed-wing, VTOL, and custom airframe design and sourcing.
Applying a disciplined systems engineering process is what separates a program that reaches certification and operational reliability on schedule from one that discovers costly design flaws late, or fails an audit. The benefits compound across the lifecycle — and are quantifiable, not just a matter of engineering preference.
Every requirement links forward to a design element and a verification result, and every design decision links back to the requirement that drove it.
A requirements-stage error typically costs an order of magnitude less to correct than the same error found in integration or flight test.
Structured hazard and safety assessment (FHA, PSSA, SSA) is embedded from the concept stage, so failure conditions are mitigated by design.
Formal verification and validation against defined acceptance criteria ensures the delivered system meets the operational need, not just the letter of a specification.
The gap between the two columns below is where programs actually win or lose time and budget. Structured, front-loaded requirements and design work costs more attention up front — and pays that back many times over.
| Without Systems Engineering | With Systems Engineering |
|---|---|
| Requirements assumed or verbal; scope creep common | Requirements documented, baselined, and traceable |
| Defects found at flight test or in service | Defects found and resolved at design/desk stage |
| Certification evidence assembled retrospectively | Certification evidence generated as a by-product of the process |
| Rework cost grows sharply late in the program | Cost of change is controlled and predictable |
| Program knowledge lost to staff turnover | Requirements, architecture & rationale documented and reusable across variants |
| Funding decisions made on assumption | Risk, cost, and maturity visible at every gate, so sponsors decide on evidence |
Systems engineering discipline changes program outcomes, not just paperwork.
Safety assessment is a critical part of the development process — even where a client has no immediate intention to certify the product, this activity remains necessary to manage liability and demonstrate due diligence.
Certification standards mapping and gap analysis against the target regulatory regime.
Functional Hazard Assessment (FHA), and Preliminary and full System Safety Assessments (PSSA/SSA).
Quality assurance documentation and process audit support.
Documentation frameworks vary by mission and geography — we scope the applicable pathway from the outset rather than assuming one.
Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems, and Safety Assessment Process Guidelines.
Familiar with U.S. Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) regulatory frameworks.
NATO standardization agreements and U.S. military standard documentation frameworks.
Remote Pilot Licence and Remotely Operated Aircraft Certificate requirements for Australian operations.
Six stages, one continuous program — each stage produces the evidence the next one needs.
We define the mission, operating environment, and target regulatory regime up front.
A Concept of Operations and structured hazard and safety assessment (FHA, PSSA, SSA) establish the safety objectives, containment requirements, and airworthiness criteria the airframe must meet.
Structural, aerodynamic, and systems design proceeds against a live compliance matrix, so every engineering decision is traceable to a certification requirement.
Structured test campaigns generate the performance, reliability, and environmental data the certifying authority requires — instrumented, logged, and traceable.
We compile the technical documentation package and act as liaison with the relevant authority through review, findings, and closure.
Once approved, we support entry into service and ongoing continued-airworthiness obligations so the certification stays valid through the aircraft's operational life.
Australia has over 1,000 qualified aerospace engineers (based on Kinexus and JSA data). We provide a specific talent-hunter service, sourcing specialists matched to client program needs.
Specialists sourced from Indonesia, other Asia-Pacific markets, and Europe.
We connect client companies with the facility access, ecosystem partners, technology-transfer relationships, and government grant cooperation they need — spanning Indonesia-based and other-country (largely Europe-based) companies and institutions.
We offer manufacture and procurement services to ease client organisations' investment cost and reduce program lead time.
Sourcing of the airframe only, or the full system, for client-designed drones.
Multirotor, fixed-wing, and VTOL platform manufacture, built to a high and reliable quality standard.
Portfolio: a sample of fixed-wing and flying-wing UAV airframes produced through our component procurement and manufacture service line, illustrating the range from raw wing sets through to fully assembled, flight-ready platforms — available on request.
Every program is scoped to its mission, payload, and regulatory environment.
Fixed-wing and multi-rotor platforms for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions.
Long-endurance platforms for pipeline, power line, and industrial asset inspection.
Multispectral and payload-flexible platforms for crop monitoring, spraying, and environmental surveying.
Payload-carrying platforms engineered for structural margin and redundancy appropriate to overflight of people and property.
Rapid-deployment platforms with thermal and low-light sensor integration.
| Class | Typical MTOW | Typical Mission Fit |
|---|---|---|
| Small UAS | Under 25 kg | Inspection, agriculture, public safety, rapid deployment |
| Medium UAS | 25 – 150 kg | Extended ISR, long-endurance inspection, light cargo |
| Large UAS | Above 150 kg | Tactical ISR, heavy cargo, sustained multi-hour missions |
| Model | Best For | What's Included |
|---|---|---|
| Full Consultancy | New unmanned systems programs from scratch | Engineering documentation, R&D, certification, and prototyping & procurement |
| Certification-Only | Existing airframes needing certification documentation | Standards mapping, safety assessment, and QA/audit support |
| Prototyping & Procurement Only | Clients with in-house regulatory teams | Component sourcing & drone manufacture only |
| Advisory | Early-stage teams evaluating feasibility | Technical & regulatory feasibility review, roadmap, and cost model |
Tell us where the program stands today and where it needs to be — we'll recommend the right engagement.
